Home
CancerScanner Technology
Clinical Trial Results
Cancer Applications
Management
Investor Information
Contact Information

 

CANCER APPLICATIONS

 

Skin Cancer Diagnosis Market

CancerScanner™ can easily diagnose skin cancer tumors by scanning the tissue area being examined and its margin. The diagnostic procedure does not cause pain, bleeding, or scarring. CancerScanner™ can scan the entire tissue area in few minutes. CancerScanner™ has the potential to eliminate unnecessary biopsies, reduce the probability of missing lesions especially in the margins and be adjunct to biopsies in diagnosing malignancy. Therefore the Company technology shall reduce the health-care costs in skin cancer diagnosis and provide greater quality/comfort in treatment of the patients.

HMO's like to pay for screenings such as Pap smears, mammograms and vaccinations because they are very inexpensive and make for very good publicity. However skin cancer screening costs much more:

Types of skin cancer treatments and their physician costs:

Type of Treatment
Completion time
Charge 
Scrape and Burn
5 minutes
$100
Deep Freezing
1.5 minutes
$100 
Interferon Inject
1 minute
$ 12
Routine Injection
15-30 minutes
$175
Mohs without "Sew" 
30-100 minutes
$325
Mohs with "Sew"
60-200 minutes
$700

HMO's may work in several ways. A doctor may sign up to care for 50,000 covered insured patients annually for a flat fee, say $40,000 per year for the whole lot. (That's 50,000 people on a particular plan like some of Humana's.) That's 80 cents per person. If most or many patients show up, the doctor will go broke seeing them all, especially if most need a treatment of some kind. It is possible that the doctor isn't going to want to do anything complicated or time-consuming for a patient, if it can be avoided. Since skin cancer does not usually return for several years following a failed treatment, it is clear that freezing, scraping and applying a cream will be high on the list of treatments an HMO doctor may use.

Because of the reasons mentioned above, an adequate, in other words excisional, biopsy is necessary for diagnosis. Many medical textbooks/doctors feel that all moles should be excised with a 2-3 mm margin (area around them). Many authorities feel that most basal-cell cancers can be removed with 90% confidence or 10% risk of failure by taking 3mm (1/8 of an inch) of normal tissue around the clinically visible basal-cell cancer. Some newer studies suggest that squamous-cell skin cancer may require a 5 mm border of normal tissue excised in order to be assured of the cure at least 95% of the time (meaning about 5% will be missed) .

Removing a mole and its margin from skin may cause scarring. Some patients are not willing to go through biopsies to avoid scars, especially if the biopsy is taken on their faces. If a scar is too deep, plastic surgery might be required. Other adverse effects of biopsies include bleeding and infection.

A.2 Potential Applications of CancerScanner technology

Skin cancer is the most common form of cancer today affecting over 1,5 million Americans annually. Currently, the majority of skin cancers are confirmed using an invasive biopsy after which they are treated surgically. Merely 20 percent of the biopsies performed however diagnose a malignancy.


Cervical Cancer Diagnosis Market

CancerScanner™ scans cervical tissue rapidly and accurately pinpoints locations of specific pathologies, including dysplasia, which is not visible to the naked eye. Therefore, CancerScanner™ has the potential to replace (or serve as an adjunct) Pap smears and colposcopies. It has also potential to resolve ASCUS by detecting cancerous cells with very low grades. Improved and earlier detection will also eliminate unnecessary biopsies. SpectraPath's technology has the potential to be used as adjunct to biopsy. Screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer is an ideal arena for the entry of bio-optical techniques for cancer detection. The tissue is easily accessible and the Papanicolaou technique (Pap smear), the standard technique in cervical cancer diagnosis, has a number of drawbacks including both false negatives and false positives.

Pap smears can miss as many as 20% of precancerous and cancerous lesions . According to another analysis, false negative rates for Pap smears range from 34-63 percent, mainly due to inadequacies of sampling, inadequacies of slide preparation, and processing problems (diagnosis subjectivity). According to estimates from the US National Cancer Institute (NCI), inconclusive results with Pap Smears create the need for additional testing, and patient care, costing the medical system $3.6 billion annually.

Unfortunately, Pap smear follow-up procedures share many similar shortcomings affecting the initial test. Follow up procedures include a combination of colposcopy, a biopsy of suspected lesions, and ASCUS (Atypical Squamous Cells of Unknown Significance).

Published studies indicate that up to 50% of colposcopies result in false positives and up to 25% of high-grade disease is misclassified as low grade. Biopsies are also subject to error. Biopsies that miss the targeted lesion or that are too small for proper pathological diagnoses are among the reasons for a well-documented false negative rate of 15% or higher25.

As a result, current clinical management of cervical cancer leads to US health care spending of $8.8 billion annually, much of which is caused by inaccurate screening procedures.

US Cervical Cancer Diagnosis Market, 2001.


 

Copyright 2004 SpectraPath Technologies Inc.